Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Click Fraud Keeps Growing and Growing...

Click Forensics, the firm that tracks click fraud using campaign data from over 3,500 marketers, reports that Pay Per Click fraud is on the rise again, increasing to 14.8 percent in the first quarter of 2007.

That's the highest level in the last twelve months and 1.1 percent up on the same period last year. The fourth quarter of 2006 click fraud rate was 14.2 percent.

Click Forensics president and CEO Tom Cuthbert commented, "Click fraud seems to be following a similar path as other online fraud schemes such as spam and phishing -- the problem is growing as fraudsters fine-tune their methods.

Although they tend to play down the size of the problem, Yahoo and Google have previously made it known that they are trying to solve the click fraud problem. In fact, Yahoo recently appointed a “click fraud tzar.”

The continuing rise in click fraud means that anyone using PPC advertising needs a system for the detection of such fraud. There are many on the market, including Zunch’s own Click Fraud Detective, which we naturally feel is a superior product.

Regardless of whose product you use, choose one and start using it. Don’t let your ad dollars go to waste.

 

PermaLink


Monday, May 07, 2007

Is This a Match Made in Heaven?

Microsoft is reportedly pursuing  Yahoo!,  to better position itself against arch rival and ruler of the search universe, Google.

According to anonymous sources (hey, they don't want to get sued for letting the cat out of the bag),Microsoft asked that Yahoo! enter into negotiations for an acquisition that could be worth $50 billion.

Yahoo's market capitalization was about $38 billion as of May 3.

Charlene Li, principal analyst at Forrester Research, noted "On paper, the deal makes sense. But in the end it's going to be so hard that I don't think it will happen."

She's probably right. I have to suspect that Yahoo! wants nothing to do with any proposal that includes them being gobbled up by Microsoft. But a partnership might be a whole different matter.

"Given the messiness of a full-out merger — and also the limited benefit it would bring to Yahoo — I believe that a merger won't be in the works anytime soon,” Ms. Li added.

“More logical would be partnership agreements where the strengths of each company are shared. These tentative first steps to a merger would make a lot more sense, giving both companies the ability to ‘test the waters’ before jumping into the deep end."

Microsoft, which remains a distant third to both Google and Yahoo! in the search engine market, is under increasing pressure to compete with Google.

Plus, Microsoft may be looking over its shoulder at Google' office applications. There' s still suspicions that once Google feels they've got all the products right, i.e., superior to Microsoft's line of office products, Google will move aggressively into that arena.

Microsoft considers itself a rival to Google in search marketing, but given Google's dominance (routinely around 50% of the search market) and the fact that Microsoft is often at less than 10% of the search market, is it a rivalry?

I'm waiting for Google to print up t-shirts like my alma mater, Texas Tech, had a few years ago. Tech has dominated Texas A&M on the football front for some 13 years now, leading an enterprising Tech fan to create a t-shirt emblazoned with--

"You Call it a Rivalry. We Call it Domination."

Maybe Google should print some up and send them to Microsoft.

 

PermaLink


Tuesday, May 01, 2007

How I'm Learning to Love Flash and Its Many Cousins

As a Web copywriter, my attitude toward Flash is generally that it is of the devil.

It interferes with the ability of the search engine spiders to read and index Web pages. It takes an interminable time to load, steering most visitors away who have no time for such foolishness.

 

And, recently, it’s actually becoming a sales tool.

 

Copywriters, particularly those with a search engine optimization background, generally hate Flash. Flash designers, generally dislike copywriters. Kind of a “good vs. evil” thing, although I leave it to you to decide who is the good guy and bad guy here.

 

Flash was once the exclusive province of the artistic and those who sought to appear cool. You may recall my blog about my experience with Ted, who was so dedicated to the idea of appearing “cool” that he was sacrificing sales leads every day.

 

Well, I’m coming around. Not to the idea that a site needs to be cool, although if a site can be both effective, i.e., turn prospects into clients, and cool, that’s great.

 

No, I now see that marketers are figuring out how to make Flash work to their benefit.

 

Marketers and designers are figuring out how to structure Flash within a site so that it does not dominate the site and drive spiders away or take a long time to load. And when I say a long time, I’m taking into account the fact that three seconds is forever on the Web. Three seconds is long enough to drive most visitors away if they have to wait for your site to load.

 

Those who have worked out the structural aspects are also figuring out something else, if you make Flash and its many cousins interactive, people will stay and “interact” with it.

 

There are sites that now offer “talking heads”-- animated individuals who speak only when rolled over or clicked on, thereby giving the visitor the power to decide if they wish to interact or not.

 

Some offer games or quizzes, adding entertainment value to the site. And entertainment is becoming increasingly important in attracting younger prospects who at the age of twenty are already jaded individuals made cynical by years of advertising bombardment.

 

And I’m seeing many other applications which are designed to engage the prospect, rather than merely put on the Internet equivalent of a laser light show (which inevitably prove boring and dull after a few seconds of initial viewing).

 

As marketing learns to work with Flash, perhaps we will finally see the day when copywriters and Flash designers can stand together and say, “We actually like each other.”

PermaLink